chore(H2): baseline security gate #12
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
idea
points
1
points
13
points
2
points
3
points
5
points
8
priority
p0
priority
p1
priority
p2
priority
p3
state
blocked
state
done
state
in-progress
state
ready
state
review
state
triage
status
declined
status
in-progress
status
planned
status
proposed
status
shipped
status
under-review
type
bug
type
epic
type
feature
type
spike
type
story
type
task
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
tti/tti-ux!12
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "chore/h2-baseline-security"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Seeds the Area H baseline SCA + secret-scan gate. After merge, mark baseline-security a required status check.
AI review · advisory
Verdict: 2 things worth fixing (1 medium · 1 low).
.forgejo/workflows/baseline.yml:82· MEDIUM — editing a file that will be overwrittenThe change modifies a seeded security gate directly in a repository, but the canonical source is
security/baseline/baseline.ymlinforgejo-stack. Local edits will be overwritten by the conformance audit..forgejo/workflows/baseline.yml:85· LOW — checksums not updated in provenance docsThe SHA-256 hashes for the new Trivy and Gitleaks releases were updated here, but the corresponding provenance documentation was not updated, risking mismatched records used by audit scripts.
⚑ panel: GPT-OSS 120B · Gemma 4 31B · Devstral 2 123B — 2 raised, 2 confirmed, 0 refuted · web: not used · context: 1 files · 6 codebase · 4 standards chunks
Panel debate — how this review was reached
Grounding — context: 1 files · 6 codebase · 4 standards chunks
Round 1 — independent reviews
Round 2 — cross-examination
GPT-OSS 120B#1Checksums not updated in provenance docs · confirmed: Devstral 2 123B · refuted: Gemma 4 31BGemma 4 31B#1Violation of canonical source constraint · confirmed: GPT-OSS 120B, Devstral 2 123B · refuted: —Synthesis — Devstral 2 123B wrote the final review from 2 confirmed findings.
Transcript
rv-20260722215008-8e38fc— full round outputs, web results, and model reasoning are viewable by anyone with access to this repository via the AI gateway.Full transcript: http://host.containers.internal:3939/-/ai/v1/review/rv-20260722215008-8e38fc
Three superPOD models reviewed this independently and cross-examined each other; only what survived is shown. Advisory — never a merge gate.